Every submission enters a three-tier evaluation system designed to identify exceptional literary work through multiple expert perspectives.
Initial Review: Multiple AI models evaluate each story across comprehensive literary criteria. Only promising works advance to specialist analysis.
Specialist Analysis: Advanced submissions receive focused evaluation from expert models trained in specific areas of literary assessment, including character development, narrative structure, and prose craft.
Final Consideration: Exceptional works reach our literary judge for final evaluation and potential prize consideration through enhanced analysis and comparative ranking.
Works advancing to specialist analysis are evaluated by eight expert models, each trained in specific aspects of literary excellence:
Character System & Psychological Depth Expert analyzes psychological complexity, interpersonal dynamics, ethical sophistication, character agency, and social embedding.
Narrative Structure & Temporality Expert examines causal architecture, narrative arc effectiveness, temporal sophistication, opening engagement, and closure satisfaction.
Thematic & Philosophical Depth Expert evaluates philosophical sophistication, symbolic economy, cultural resonance, and thematic integration.
Stylistic & Rhetorical Mastery Expert assesses syntactic mastery, figurative language precision, narrative voice distinctiveness, and diction effectiveness.
World Construction & Environmental Expert analyzes ontological architecture, cultural embedding, atmospheric creation, and environmental significance.
Aesthetic Innovation & Formal Experimentation Expert evaluates form-content integration, technical innovation, aesthetic density, and genre transcendence.
Reader Response & Interpretive Complexity Expert measures interpretive richness, emotional impact, critical engagement potential, and accessibility balance.
Holistic Literary Judge provides comprehensive assessment of overall artistic achievement, integration coherence, literary merit, and vision execution.
Stories are evaluated across key areas including character complexity and development, narrative structure and pacing, thematic depth and meaning, prose style and voice, world-building and setting, creative innovation, and overall reader impact.
"scores": {
"psychological_complexity": [score],
"interpersonal_dynamics": [score],
"ethical_complexity": [score],
"character_agency": [score],
"social_embedding": [score],
"causal_coherence": [score],
"narrative_arc": [score],
"temporal_sophistication": [score],
"opening_effectiveness": [score],
"closure_satisfaction": [score],
"philosophical_inquiry": [score],
"symbolic_economy": [score],
"cultural_resonance": [score],
"thematic_integration": [score],
"syntactic_mastery": [score],
"figurative_language": [score],
"narrative_voice": [score],
"diction_precision": [score],
"world_construction": [score],
"cultural_embedding": [score],
"atmospheric_creation": [score],
"environmental_significance": [score],
"form_content_integration": [score],
"literary_innovation": [score],
"aesthetic_density": [score],
"genre_transcendence": [score],
"interpretive_richness": [score],
"emotional_impact": [score],
"critical_engagement": [score],
"accessibility_balance": [score]
},
"justification": "[Comprehensive analysis covering all major elements with specific examples from the text]",
"confidence": [0.0-1.0]When models produce divergent results, our system accounts for this variance through consensus-building protocols that ensure fair and comprehensive assessment of all literary approaches.
Scores range from 1-1000 points. Works achieving 801-1000 demonstrate exceptional quality with prize-winning potential. All submissions receive detailed feedback highlighting strengths and areas for development.